Great Escapes Read online




  COPYRIGHT

  Published by Collins

  An imprint of HarperCollins Publishers

  Westerhill Road

  Bishopbriggs

  Glasgow G64 2QT

  www.harpercollins.co.uk

  First published 2015

  © HarperCollins Publishers 2015

  Text © Dr. Barbara A. Bond 2015

  Illustrations and Images © see pages

  Collins® is a registered trademark of HarperCollins Publishers Ltd

  A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library

  All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. By payment of the required fees, you have been granted the nonexclusive, nontransferable right to access and read the text of this e-book on-screen. No part of this text may be reproduced, transmitted, downloaded, decompiled, reverse-engineered, or stored in or introduced into any information storage and retrieval system, in any form or by any means, whether electronic or mechanical, now known or hereafter invented, without the express written permission of HarperCollins e-books.

  The contents of this publication are believed correct at the time of printing. Nevertheless the publisher can accept no responsibility for errors or omissions, changes in the detail given or for any expense or loss thereby caused.

  Source ISBN: 9780008141301

  Ebook Edition © AUGUST 2015 ISBN: 9780008165062

  Version: 2015-08-27

  10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

  If you would like to comment on any aspect of this book, please contact us at the above address or online:

  [email protected]

  facebook.com/collinsmaps

  @collinsmaps

  CONTENTS

  Copyright

  Acknowledgements

  Introduction

  Chapter 1 The Creation of MI9

  Chapter 2 Background to the Mapping Programme

  Chapter 3 The Map Production Programme

  Chapter 4 Smuggling Maps and Other Escape Aids into the Camps

  Chapter 5 Coded Correspondence with the Camps

  Chapter 6 The Schaffhausen Salient and Airey Neave’s Escape

  Chapter 7 Escaping Through the Baltic Ports

  Chapter 8 Copying Maps in the Camps

  Chapter 9 MI9 and its Contribution to Military Mapping

  Appendices

  Appendices 1–9 Maps Known to have been Produced by MI9: A Carto-Bibliography

  Appendix 10 Decoding a Hidden Message

  Bibliography

  Illustration and Photographic Credits

  Index

  About the Publisher

  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

  I am indebted to many people for the realization of this long held ambition. To many friends and colleagues in Plymouth University especially Professor Wendy Purcell, formerly the Vice-Chancellor, for her inspiration, belief and confidence, Associate Professor Harry Bennett, Professor Mark Brayshay and Professor Kevin Jefferys for their outstanding scholarship, support and encouragement, Professor David McMullan for sharing his knowledge of cryptography, Tim Absalom and Jamie Quinn for their cartographic expertise, Andy Merrington and Lloyd Russell for photographs; to Peter Clark, formerly the Chief Map Research Officer in the Ministry of Defence, long-time professional colleague, mentor and friend, whose cartographic knowledge and expertise, and willingness to share them, remains undiminished; to Paul Hancock, Brian Garvan and Jim Caruth, former colleagues in the Mapping and Charting Establishment RE (now the Defence Geographic Centre); to the custodians of the many map collections, record repositories and museums I have visited and talked to in my pursuit of the pieces of the jigsaw puzzle, not least The National Archives, British Library, National Library of Scotland, Macclesfield Silk Museum, University of Glasgow, Second World War Experience Centre, Royal Air Force Museum, and the Intelligence Corps Museum; to John E. Bartholomew and the late John C. Bartholomew, Nicola Shelmerdine, daughter of the late Flight Lieutenant John H. Shelmerdine DFC, and Stephen Pryor, son of the late Commander John Pryor RN, for allowing access to family archives; to the late Professor M. R. D. Foot for sharing his experiences and knowledge.

  My deepest thanks go to them all.

  This book is dedicated to Roger, Abi and Ben, Adam and Johanna, for their love and support.

  INTRODUCTION

  ‘It is the intelligent use of geographical knowledge that outwits the enemy and wins wars.’

  (W. G. V. Balchin in The Geographical Journal, July 1987)

  This book is the culmination of the author’s personal fascination with maps and charts, and especially with military maps on silk. To be given the task, as a young researcher in the Ministry of Defence Map Library over thirty years ago, of identifying MI9’s escape and evasion maps and creating an archival record set of them was a piece of serendipity. That small task ignited an interest which has never been extinguished. It was, however, only after retirement that the opportunity arose to commit to a detailed and more in-depth study of the subject: the reward was the discovery of a story of remarkable cartographic intrigue and ingenuity, and the opportunity to make this small contribution to the history of cartography in the twentieth century.

  During the course of World War II, a complex and daring operation was launched by MI9, a newly formed branch of the British intelligence services, to help servicemen evade capture and, for those who were captured, to assist them in escaping from prisoner of war camps across Europe. Ingenious methods were devised to deliver escape and evasion aids to prisoners, and intricate codes were developed to communicate with the camps. In stories that often appear stranger than fiction, such materials proved critical and made many escapes possible. Maps were an integral part of this operation, with maps printed on silk and other fabrics commonly being secreted in innocent-looking items being sent to the camps, for example in playing cards, board games and gramophone records. The role of maps in this operation has often been overlooked and, because of strict instructions to service personnel at the time not to speak about the maps, the story has remained largely untold.

  The principal aim of this book is, for the first time, to reconstruct, document and analyse the programme of escape and evasion mapping on which MI9 embarked. Such an exercise has never previously been attempted. The book charts the origins, scope, nature, character and impact of MI9’s escape and evasion mapping programme in the period 1939–45. It traces the development of the mapping programme in the face of many challenges and describes the ways in which MI9 sought to overcome those challenges with the considerable assistance of both individuals and commercial companies. Through a number of examples, the extent to which the mapping programme was the key to the success of the whole of MI9’s escape programme is assessed. The Appendices contain a detailed carto-bibliography, where all the individual maps are identified and described; production details are provided and location information on those surviving copies which have been identified is also provided.

  The new intelligence branch was born in December 1939 and was charged with escape and evasion activities to support those who, it was anticipated, would either be shot down in enemy-held territory or would be captured. Its gestation had been lengthy. From the view held prior to World War I that there was something ignominious about capture, the military philosophy had evolved sufficiently in the inter-war period for escape activity to be regarded as a priority in the greater scheme of warfare. The new branch tried to tackle the aftermath of the disaster which befell the Expeditionary Force at Dunkirk in May 1940, but it took time and resources to mount the sort of organization which was needed. By then the nation was led by a new Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, who had had personal experience of escaping from captivity in the Boer War and was, undoubtedly, a natu
ral ambassador for the changed philosophy. He had been a war correspondent for the Morning Post and was captured by the Boers in November 1899. He escaped on 12 December, and, travelling on foot and by train, he successfully made it across the border to Mozambique and freedom. In his account he noted that he was ‘in the heart of the enemy’s country’ but lacked ‘the compass and the map which might have guided me’.

  The story of the mapping programme which became such an important part of MI9’s escape programme has been difficult to piece together. No single, comprehensive record of the production programme has ever been found and the archival record set of the maps is only now (2015) being deposited in The National Archives by the Ministry of Defence. Copies of the maps have been found in many collections, both public and private, throughout the country. There is, however, very little mention of the maps in the published literature and some of the possibly relevant MI9 files in The National Archives are still closed. Reconstructing the story has proved to be like the reassembly of a jigsaw puzzle where some pieces are still missing, possibly lost for all time. Nevertheless, careful enquiry has yielded enough evidence to enable the narrative to be recovered. What emerges is a story of quite amazing inspiration and ingenuity in a country at war, fighting for the survival of its core democratic values and standards.

  The intelligence world of the time also needs to be considered. MI9 was a new player in a world where others had already carved out for themselves a sizable role and niche. The part played by MI6, more commonly referred to as SIS (the Secret Intelligence Service), proved to be unhelpful and unsupportive to the newly created branch. The key staff recruited to MI9, especially Christopher Clayton Hutton, who was ultimately responsible for the mapping programme, had some of the skills they needed, but absolutely no cartographic awareness. The dark fog which often surrounded the world of security and espionage meant that key contacts were not made at critical times and there was often a lack of awareness of where the experience and expertise which MI9 so badly needed actually lay.

  Producing the maps was one thing, getting them to the prisoners of war was quite another. Just how they were smuggled into the camps, how MI9 communicated with the camps, and how the whole escape programme took shape is part of the unfolding story. The art of smuggling items inside hollowed out containers was used extensively by MI9, who persuaded the manufacturers of board games and other leisure aids to assist them in their endeavours. Coded communication with the camps proved to be the vital link in the chain and deciphering a number of surviving coded letters provided the proof of the importance of that system of communication. The prisoners of war themselves also rose to the challenge. They had been trained that it was their duty to attempt to escape, not least by MI9 itself, which promoted the philosophy of ‘escape-mindedness’ through its Training School. Escape committees were set up in many of the camps, certainly in the oflags (prisoner of war camps for officers). The many hours of the potentially excruciating boredom of captivity were funnelled into escape activity. Escapes were managed as military operations in both the planning and execution. Men used their talents and, in many cases, their professional expertise, to copy maps, to produce compasses and clothing, and to forge papers and passes to aid the escapers on their journey to freedom. Lessons were learned from both the successes and failures, and key experiences were either brought back to the camps by the failed escapers or relayed back to the camps by the successful escapers, for use in future attempts.

  The structure of the book reflects the story of the mapping programme as it unfolded. Chapter 1 shows that MI9 was essentially a creation of World War II and it reflected a markedly changed military attitude to capture, escape and evasion. It was staffed with people who had been carefully selected by the head of the fledgling organization. The skills and experiences which they each brought to the task are described and acknowledged, and the development of the organization itself is traced. Chapter 2 looks at the background behind the development of the mapping programme and the long history of military mapping on silk, which was most certainly not prompted simply by a twentieth-century war. Chapter 3 describes in detail the whole map production programme from the individual series, through the printing process to the sourcing of silk, and later, of man-made fibre. The covert nature of the programme and the compartmentalized way in which it was managed by MI9 resulted in their own unique, and arguably unnecessary, challenges. Having documented and analysed both the production programme and the maps themselves, the book continues in Chapter 4 by addressing the whole escape aids programme. The sheer ingenuity and originality of the smuggling programme which MI9 mounted in order to ensure that the maps reached their destinations is addressed. The whole of Chapter 5 is given over to a detailed discussion of the coded correspondence, augmented by the first deciphering of some of the original coded correspondence from a family archive.

  A number of escapes were selected as examples to try to prove the value of the maps produced. The first of these, considered in Chapter 6, was based on one of the most successful escape routes which MI9 planned from occupied Europe to the safe haven of neutral Switzerland. Chapter 7 examines escapes via the Baltic ports to neutral Sweden, an even more successful route to freedom, and Chapter 8 studies the ways in which maps were copied in the camps and analyses two surviving maps apparently drawn in prisoner of war camps. Finally, Chapter 9 seeks to offer an objective assessment of the real success of the mapping programme in the light of the many obstacles and challenges which MI9 faced.

  Without question, the maps produced by MI9 proved to be the key to successful escape: without them many, perhaps most, of the thousands of men who successfully escaped and made it back to these shores before the end of the war would have failed in their efforts.

  The value of printing military maps on fabric has been long recognized. This map, printed on cloth, covers part of northwestern Georgia and adjacent Alabama to the west of Atlanta. It is annotated in blue pencil in the upper margin: ‘Specimen of field maps used in Sherman’s campaigns, 1864’ (see pages 40–41).

  1

  THE CREATION OF MI9

  ‘Escaping and evading are ancient arts of war.’

  (Field-Marshal Sir Gerald Templar, in the Foreword to MI9: Escape and Evasion, 1939–1945 by M. R. D. Foot and J. M. Langley)

  MI9 was created on 23 December 1939 as a new branch of British intelligence to provide escape and evasion support to captured servicemen and to airmen shot down over enemy-held territory through the course of World War II. Arguably, it was not soon enough, as, less than six months after its creation, thousands of British Service personnel found themselves captured on the beaches at Dunkirk. MI9 was established within the Directorate of Military Intelligence, which came into existence in 1939 when, with the Directorate of Military Operations, it superseded a previously combined Directorate of Military Operations and Intelligence. Five of the Military Intelligence sections, MI1 to MI5, continued their work within the new Directorate, dealing, as before, with organization, geographic, topographic, coded communication and security matters.

  The creation of MI9 stemmed from the experience of many during World War I, when military philosophy about prisoners of war underwent a sea-change. From regarding capture and captivity in enemy hands as a somewhat ignominious, even shameful and disgraceful fate, the value that escaping prisoners of war might contribute to the success of the war effort gradually came to be recognized. Men who escaped or evaded capture and returned to Britain brought back vital intelligence and boosted the morale of the Armed Services and, not least, their own families. In addition, the considerable effort required to prevent escapes from the camps deflected the enemy’s resources from front-line combat action.

  In the late 1930s, as the prospect of war became increasingly likely, proposals for the creation of a section tasked to look after the interests of British prisoners of war came from many quarters, not least from Lieutenant Colonel (later Field-Marshal) Gerald Templar who had written to the Director of Milit
ary Intelligence in September 1939. A number of conferences with those who had been prisoners of war during World War I had also been arranged by MI1, seeking to benefit from their collective experiences. The actual proposal to the Joint Intelligence Committee to create such a branch came from Sir Campbell Stuart, who chaired a War Office Committee looking at the coordination of political intelligence and military operations. There had clearly been some robust discussions, since Viscount Halifax, appointed Foreign Secretary in February 1938 by the Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, had indicated in a letter dated 5 December 1939 to Sir Campbell that his preference was for the section to be under Foreign Office control, with direct Treasury funding, presumably to ensure joint control and coordination with MI6, the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS). Notwithstanding this high-level opposition, the creation of MI9 went ahead in the War Office and it was made responsible to the Deputy Director for Military Intelligence, initially working closely with the Admiralty and the Air Ministry. With hindsight, the later animosity and conflict between MI9 and SIS (see Chapter 9) might well have had its roots in the initial difference of opinion as to where the newly formed section should sit in the governmental hierarchy.

  Three British prisoner of war escapers who tunnelled out of Holzminden prisoner of war camp in Germany during World War I on 23 July 1918. That night twenty-nine men made good their escape, ten of whom made their way to the neutral Netherlands some 320 kilometres (200 miles) from the camp and eventually back to Britain. Left to right: Captain Caspar Kennard, Major Gray and Lieutenant Blair, all of the Royal Flying Corps.

  Sir Campbell Stuart (1885–1972), who made the initial proposal for the creation of MI9 to the Joint Intelligence Committee in 1939.

  MI9’s objectives and methods were first outlined in the ‘Conduct of Work No. 48’, issued by the Directorate of Military Intelligence on 23 December 1939. In MI9’s War Diaries (the regular record of daily, weekly or monthly activities undertaken by the War Office branches during the war), its objectives were more fully described as: